Boutrous now concern-trolling about how case goes back to the "beginning of Uber's operations" so it's just "not doable" as a class action
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
What's incredible to me is how there's actually a bunch of questions of fact dispositive to Uber but that's stuff for the trial
1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
It's so awkward for Boutrous to keep talking about "Well that's a question of fact" at a class certification hearing but ugh SCOTUS
1 réponse 0 Retweet 2 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Uber now arguing that drivers are able to set up their own little sub companies of Uber drivers. SLR saying it's irrelevant b/c
1 réponse 2 Retweets 3 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
right of control & right of termination are still the same. AT THE SAME TIME, does this mean that it's possible to have a world where
2 réponses 2 Retweets 3 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
there are employer/employee relationships that sprout out into some mandelbrot shit?
4 réponses 2 Retweets 8 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
this is my personal commentary, not what he's saying
1 réponse 0 Retweet 4 j'aime -
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Uber: "This is an unusual proceeding" no shit
1 réponse 0 Retweet 10 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Haha both sides are citing a case that just settled, a case whose settlement hearing came RIGHT BEFORE THIS HEARING, same room
3 réponses 1 Retweet 16 j'aime
sarah jeong a retweeté Beth Winegarner
* just proposed a settlementhttps://twitter.com/beth_winegarner/status/629433069427036160 …
sarah jeong ajouté,
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.