Consider this: everything out of reddit recently has been talking about how they're not trying to monetize, they're going for growth
-
-
En réponse à @steveklabnik
... banning racist subreddits would cause a huge drop in growth. Who is declaring that growth is the focus of the company?
2 réponses 3 Retweets 8 j'aime -
En réponse à @steveklabnik
A: VCs, and the board. So basically, the VC system is partially responsible for reddit not banhammering racists
1 réponse 3 Retweets 11 j'aime -
En réponse à @steveklabnik
If Reddit didn't have to answer to investors, then they could say "we dont' mind losing traffic because of racists" but they can't
2 réponses 7 Retweets 11 j'aime -
En réponse à @steveklabnik
Why host these forums for free, and without ads? Pageviews. It's that simple. What gets measured gets done, management 101.
1 réponse 5 Retweets 7 j'aime -
En réponse à @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik does anyone know how many pageviews are being generated by the chimpire subreddits? The subscription numbers aren't huge1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong yeah but secondary effects, how many hardcore free speech types who don't sub to the chimpire will bail1 réponse 0 Retweet 2 j'aime -
En réponse à @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik presupposes that there's people who haven't left due to r/rapingwomen being banned, but the chimpire would be the final straw3 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
@steveklabnik an internal board conversation has to be around whether the problem subreddits are in themselves impeding growth
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.