@sarahjeong ((or maybe Gawker watches People Vs. Larry Flynt and, inspired, takes this up to SCOTUS on principle.))
-
-
En réponse à @adamsteinbaugh
@adamsteinbaugh I'd love that but idk if they have the money?1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@adamsteinbaugh and I don't think it's a good enough set of facts that someone would take them pro bono1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong if it got to SCOTUS, I could imagine some enterprising free speecher taking it pro bono.1 réponse 0 Retweet 2 j'aime -
En réponse à @adamsteinbaugh
@adamsteinbaugh yeah okay i see that. so they only have to pay billables for the cert petition and then there would be so many amici1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@adamsteinbaugh but this is assuming they have the money for the appeals which is idk2 réponses 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@adamsteinbaugh so someone would have to see this as a potential SCOTUS issue early on and get stoked about it1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong I don't think SCOTUS has substantively touched on the privacy torts and the First Amendment in... well, a long time.1 réponse 0 Retweet 2 j'aime -
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong I think RICHARD NIXON may have argued the last significant case in this area. lol.2 réponses 0 Retweet 3 j'aime
@adamsteinbaugh fuck, adam, we've gotta write something together
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.