@adamsteinbaugh like journalists want to deny each other the title of "journalist" if the assessment of newsworthiness is so objectionable
@adamsteinbaugh honestly the verdict is going to be more important. i can't imagine anything interesting raised at trial
-
-
@sarahjeong the verdict will be more important for the message it sends, but the legal issues won't get hot until the appeal. -
@sarahjeong (unless the verdict is for Hogan and for like $10k and Gawker decides the appeal isn't worth it.) -
@sarahjeong ((or maybe Gawker watches People Vs. Larry Flynt and, inspired, takes this up to SCOTUS on principle.)) -
@adamsteinbaugh I'd love that but idk if they have the money? -
@adamsteinbaugh and I don't think it's a good enough set of facts that someone would take them pro bono -
@sarahjeong if it got to SCOTUS, I could imagine some enterprising free speecher taking it pro bono. -
@adamsteinbaugh yeah okay i see that. so they only have to pay billables for the cert petition and then there would be so many amici -
@adamsteinbaugh but this is assuming they have the money for the appeals which is idk - 1 réponse de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@adamsteinbaugh i wanted to do the silk road trial because i was interested in the witnesses and the exhibits. and oh boy they were greatMerci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.