"You're discussing interesting and nuanced legal issues at play in this case. What a bad 'journalist'. Anyway, here's a celeb sex tape."
-
-
En réponse à @adamsteinbaugh
@adamsteinbaugh i really want to have a long conversation with you on this at some point1 réponse 0 Retweet 2 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong im having long conversations with myself in my head about it and hate it1 réponse 0 Retweet 2 j'aime -
En réponse à @adamsteinbaugh
@adamsteinbaugh honestly though the whole press freedom thing is really making my head spin. it's not a good set of facts, but1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@adamsteinbaugh the effect on online journalism is quite dire1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong exactly. Then I start worrying about who decides what's newsworthy: the fourth estate or a judge after publication?1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @adamsteinbaugh
@adamsteinbaugh newsworthiness and the public/private distinction is itself an ouroboros and idk how to resolve it in jurisprudence2 réponses 1 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@adamsteinbaugh which is all well and good in the classroom but if it wrecks the future of journalism idk idk idk2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong@adamsteinbaugh so, public/private on the internets seems like the crux of a lot of problems :\2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @knowtheory
@knowtheory@adamsteinbaugh well the public/private distinction is bullshit and not applicable in the journalistic context imo1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
@knowtheory @adamsteinbaugh journalists transfer things from the private to the public. they publicize. that is journalism
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.