@tieguy @lea_rosen @xor @LAKUTIS we jumped to defenses but what about infringement? are we assuming likelihood of confusion, or dilution?
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong@lea_rosen@xor@LAKUTIS I assume sufficient likelihood of confusion to survive SJ, esp. w/ deference given to famous mark2 réponses 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @luis_in_brief
@sarahjeong@lea_rosen@xor@LAKUTIS again, wrt infringement I suspect courts will give more deference if goods are clearly parodic1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @luis_in_brief
@tieguy@sarahjeong@xor no the name is the joke. Can't that be the joke? I forget2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @lea_rosen
@lea_rosen@sarahjeong@xor black letter law? yeah, the name can be the joke. Legal realism? Court is going to be influenced by goods.2 réponses 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @luis_in_brief
@lea_rosen@sarahjeong@xor but like I said initially, probably Cacafella wins. Just not clear enough to avoid getting sued.1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @luis_in_brief
@tieguy@lea_rosen@xor I think I agree with you then. No summary judgment, but after a trial, Cacafella wins1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@tieguy@lea_rosen@xor and certainly PTO would not register CACAFELLA RECORDS1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong@tieguy@xor i don't think I'd bother if it were my client but that's why I'm not the tm lawyer2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @lea_rosen
@lea_rosen@sarahjeong@xor hah, I'm not really a TM lawyer either. [Batsignal emoji] for@pchestek ;)2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
@tieguy @lea_rosen @xor @pchestek well neither am I so we're just a bunch of assholes flapping our mouths off I guess
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.