Asking 4 a friend @xor @insunlight @tieguy @kurtopsahlhttps://twitter.com/LAKUTIS/status/605544051966922752 …
@tieguy @lea_rosen @xor @LAKUTIS we jumped to defenses but what about infringement? are we assuming likelihood of confusion, or dilution?
-
-
@sarahjeong@tieguy@lea_rosen@LAKUTIS curious, does the calculus change if you instead use "cacafeller"? -
@xor@tieguy@lea_rosen@LAKUTIS I think that's a question of fact, not law -
@sarahjeong@tieguy@lea_rosen@LAKUTIS is there precedent around TMs that both reference a common source tho? -
@xor@tieguy@lea_rosen@LAKUTIS almost certainly in TTAB, nothing off the top of my head for appellate -
@sarahjeong@xor@tieguy@lea_rosen this the most lit convo ever. I think what im hearing is that i HAVE TO DO THIS -
@LAKUTIS well you know who to call if you do my friend@sarahjeong@xor@tieguy
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@sarahjeong@lea_rosen@xor@LAKUTIS I assume sufficient likelihood of confusion to survive SJ, esp. w/ deference given to famous mark -
@sarahjeong@lea_rosen@xor@LAKUTIS again, wrt infringement I suspect courts will give more deference if goods are clearly parodic -
@tieguy@sarahjeong@xor no the name is the joke. Can't that be the joke? I forget -
@tieguy@sarahjeong@xor what if the record label was called [poo emoji] [dude emoji]
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.