@sarahjeong @vogon @0xabad1dea my guess is it's a really naive algorithm based on interests/etc
which is actually really ironic
-
-
En réponse à @FioraAeterna
@FioraAeterna@sarahjeong@0xabad1dea my instinct is that it's gendered display names + vocabulary analysis2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @vogon
@vogon@FioraAeterna@0xabad1dea Yeah I mean it's got to be that also but they've got to be checking up against training data2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong@FioraAeterna@0xabad1dea I'd expect their training data is people with blue checkmarks1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @vogon
@vogon@FioraAeterna@0xabad1dea Question, when you guys add the general Twitter comparison audience, do you see the male/female ratio?2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong@FioraAeterna@0xabad1dea nope, it disappears when you do that2 réponses 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @vogon
@sarahjeong@FioraAeterna@0xabad1dea charitable interpretation is that the number is wrong; the less-charitable one is it's unflattering1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @vogon
@vogon@FioraAeterna@0xabad1dea well the number being wrong is hardly flattering1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong@FioraAeterna@0xabad1dea yeah but they can handwave away "oh our audience is 50/50 but our gender targeting is a little wonky"2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @vogon
@sarahjeong@FioraAeterna@0xabad1dea they can't handwave away "oh no 80% of our users are actually dudes"1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime
@vogon @FioraAeterna @0xabad1dea which i'm not sure can be true but it would sure explain why every woman's mentions are full of crap
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.