journalists: please do not aggregate my tweets, i am not a nat sec law expert
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
so basically gov't is arguing that Twitter can be menaced by a not-law letter telling them what they can and can't say and it doesn't matter
1 réponse 2 Retweets 4 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
LMAO the government is arguing that the FISC is the right forum but they are also arguing...
1 réponse 1 Retweet 2 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
... they can't even acknowledge there is a FISC-reated order involved because that information is in itself classified
2 réponses 1 Retweet 4 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
welp separation of powers talk, i'm zoning out for this one, sorry guyspic.twitter.com/a4MOpBONKs
1 réponse 0 Retweet 16 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
now talking about pending 9th circuit stuff that would affect this case
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
government says what they said about the 0 issue (warrant canaries) is not a concession, slightly flustered
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
but repeats what he said. Saying you've received 0 is not a problem. Warrant canaries good to go?
1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime
What's awesome* about this case is how the government keeps not being able to say stuff or describe stuff bc classification
-
-
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.