@sarahjeong @kevinmarks @anildash @pornlaw hmmm. I wonder if we wrote thinkpieces about it, we could be thoughtleaders
-
-
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
@sarahjeong@adamsteinbaugh@anildash@pornlaw as@latoyajackson and@stoya point out, the pro porn companies follow it. For age reasons? -
@kevinmarks@adamsteinbaugh@anildash@pornlaw@latoyajackson@stoya basically it’s the closest the anti-porn lobby got to what they wanted -
@kevinmarks@adamsteinbaugh@anildash@pornlaw@latoyajackson@stoya historically, 2257 is a protection against coerced porn
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@sarahjeong@adamsteinbaugh@kevinmarks@anildash I think Randazza used 2257 in a revenge porn case after I used 2257 in a copyright case. -
@pornlaw@adamsteinbaugh@kevinmarks@anildash what were the outcomes? still pending? -
@sarahjeong@adamsteinbaugh@kevinmarks@anildash Randazza won a verdict and my federal judge refused to address the issue.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@sarahjeong@adamsteinbaugh@kevinmarks@anildash It's also possible to use TM law but that requires planning & not that useful for publicMerci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
@sarahjeong@adamsteinbaugh@kevinmarks@anildash In litigation it's a powerful tool but FALA is generally against using 2257 as a sword.Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.