Why do tech companies have a lower standard of consent for nude images than the porn industry? http://fusion.net/story/103189/the-porn-industry-i-work-in-most-certainly-requires-consent/ …pic.twitter.com/55RGaMWSad
Vous pouvez ajouter des informations de localisation à vos Tweets, comme votre ville ou votre localisation précise, depuis le Web et via des applications tierces. Vous avez toujours la possibilité de supprimer l'historique de localisation de vos Tweets. En savoir plus
@sarahjeong to be clear, I'm not personally advocating 2257s for social networks.
@sarahjeong @anildash is there a requirement for them to be public, or just to be kept for access by law enforcement?
@sarahjeong @anildash I can see a way where they are required for making a qualifying image public, not private. Nuance possible
@kevinmarks @anildash there isn’t consistent enforcement around 2257 and some companies will hand over 2257 forms to whoever asks
@sarahjeong @anildash reading 2257 it's not "anything sexy" - it is relatively well defined.
@kevinmarks @anildash but if you're talking about a voluntary tech company standard for *revenge porn* the standard is going to be different
@sarahjeong @anildash isn't "revenge porn" in direct violation of that statute? Posting it without the consent and proof of age?
@kevinmarks @anildash it might be! 2257 is close to being my albatross re: revenge porn remedies. no one pays attention to it
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.