@marciahofmann Question we're all asking is whether the new typefaces are creative enough to warrant copyright protection. @xor @sarahjeong
-
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong@marciahofmann@xor Wait, now I'm confused — is the typeface file ineligible, or do I need to instruct a computer to trace it?1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @flamsmark
@flamsmark@marciahofmann@xor the file itself would be subject to software ©, the typeface *as typeface* (a visual work) is uncopyrightable1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong@marciahofmann@xor What part of the file is software, or are vector descriptions of the shapes of letters “software“?2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @flamsmark
@flamsmark@sarahjeong@marciahofmann hey guys hey guys what if this is a typeface that includes some higher Unicode ranges, like emoji3 réponses 0 Retweet 2 j'aime -
En réponse à @xor
@xor@flamsmark@sarahjeong@marciahofmann the unicode spec claims copyright over the sample emoji1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @mjg59
@mjg59@flamsmark@sarahjeong@marciahofmann which sort of makes sense? Especially as a collection? This is very weird.3 réponses 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong@mjg59@flamsmark@marciahofmann wingdings would seem to have a *better* claim under Feist, as the arrangement is original2 réponses 0 Retweet 1 j'aime
@xor @mjg59 @flamsmark @marciahofmann oh my god you’re right
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.