no, copyright infringement is never like rape, you are terrible for drawing that analogy http://illusionofmore.com/jonathan-band-flogs-fair-use/ …pic.twitter.com/mMnuGE9rZB
Vous pouvez ajouter des informations de localisation à vos Tweets, comme votre ville ou votre localisation précise, depuis le Web et via des applications tierces. Vous avez toujours la possibilité de supprimer l'historique de localisation de vos Tweets. En savoir plus
.@Illusionofmore why would you refer at all to rape except to bring in the shock value WHEN TALKING ABOUT COPYRIGHT? That is disgusting yo
@sarahjeong ...what is the difference between role-play sexual violence and sexual violence? Permission and limits set by the "used."
.@Illusionofmore It is LITERALLY right there, you are running “aggravated rape” in parallel with copyright infringement as an analogy.
@sarahjeong I understand why you think that, but again, what makes S&M not an assault?
@Illusionofmore @sarahjeong You're missing the point. It's not that your analogy isn't obvious, it's that YOU USED IT IN THE FIRST PLACE.
@SpaceAgNicole @sarahjeong Respectfully, I think the point is the word is incendiary, and would notbelittle the crime itself. Believe me.
@Illusionofmore @sarahjeong You said "good copyright:bad copyright::S&M:rape," which is 100% belittling rape.
@SpaceAgNicole @sarahjeong In over 200,000 words on these issues, I've never made a blithe remark about violence like rape.
@sarahjeong @Illusionofmore Sure it's for gratuitous shock value, but it's on the other side of the analogy. It's not a comparison.
.@sep332 You shouldn’t analogize copyright infringement to rape. It’s disgusting. Also misleading, but mostly disgusting. @Illusionofmore
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.