@sarahjeong No, it isn't. Which is why that's not what it says. The point is about permission.
-
-
-
.
@Illusionofmore no, you quite literally analogized copyright infringement to “aggravated rape,” it’s right there for everyone to see -
@sarahjeong No. Diff between S&M and rape is permission. It's metaphorical from POV of "used" but not equating two acts. -
.
@Illusionofmore Like I said, you LITERALLY ANALOGIZED TO RAPE, IT’S RIGHT THERE, but beyond that, -
.
@Illusionofmore why would you refer at all to rape except to bring in the shock value WHEN TALKING ABOUT COPYRIGHT? That is disgusting yo -
@sarahjeong ...what is the difference between role-play sexual violence and sexual violence? Permission and limits set by the "used." -
.
@Illusionofmore It is LITERALLY right there, you are running “aggravated rape” in parallel with copyright infringement as an analogy. -
@sarahjeong I understand why you think that, but again, what makes S&M not an assault? - 10 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@sarahjeong@mmasnick although it's equally invalid to use theft as an analogy. -
@andrewjskatz@mmasnick invalid, but not as morally repugnant
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@sarahjeong@tvol and the sorry-not-sorry addendum makes it so much worse!Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
@sarahjeong@xor Wrong (awful) language, and also wrong about the law (as characters can be copyrighted, and used by others per Fair Use).Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
@sarahjeong@mmasnick That they insist on perpetual ownership and control is the problem. Remind them that copyright is not property.Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Cosign 100000x RT
@sarahjeong no copyright infringement is never like rape, you are terrible for drawing that analogy http://illusionofmore.com/jonathan-band-flogs-fair-use/ …Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
@sarahjeong It's not even copyright infringement. It's fully legal, NONINFRINGING fair use of your own property.https://falkvinge.net/2015/02/11/copyright-monopolist-claims-legal-non-infringing-uses-of-your-own-property-without-asking-unnecessary-permission-anyway-is-like-aggravated-rape/ …Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
@sarahjeong Ewwwwwwwwww. This kind of inflated,inappropriate rhetoric makes it tough to take a lot of copyright defenders seriouslyMerci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
@sarahjeong what in the bloody hellMerci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
@sarahjeong obvi this writer has zero experience with kink.Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
@sarahjeong@unintelligibl3 people make me sadMerci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.