-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
If you think a Harvard 1L Crim Law class is going to teach you anything you apply in practice... ..I guess that's a understandable mistake.
2 réponses 0 Retweet 9 j'aime -
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong yeah - the idea that anyone who goes on to be a PD or work with rape survivors will learn the law from crim is ridiculous.1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @KendraSerra
.
@KendraSerra it's also dumb to conclude TWs impede learning law. & Nobody uses TWs at Harvard. Never knew anyone who asked for one either.1 réponse 0 Retweet 2 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong yup. Also pro tip to profs: if students are telling you not to teach rape in crim, maybe you aren't teaching it very well?1 réponse 1 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @KendraSerra
.
@KendraSerra In my class we didn't learn about property crimes, any 4th Am issues, or police entrapment. Why include rape and not those?1 réponse 1 Retweet 4 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong EXACTLY. It's a constructed, fake subject, meant to teach "how to think like a lawyer." Why bother with rape?1 réponse 0 Retweet 2 j'aime
.@KendraSerra It comes out of tradition, and tradition isn't neutral. Or even particularly educational or effective.
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.