All this rings of "well everyone was having fun at the time" of the 1950s when female students were only called on "Ladies' Day"
-
-
-
The complaints, the anxiety are women no longer being silent, not an environment of hysteria being whipped up out of nowhere
-
Even Prof. Suk, who is a bonafide feminist, teaches a class that is clearly delineated by tradition. But the tradition itself is shitty.
-
Being forced to play devil's advocate with the subject of rape--alongside classmates, some of whom assuredly buy into rape culture--is awful
-
On top of that, by that point in the school year-- what kind of interactions have the sectionmates had with each other?
-
Is that student who seems really into defendants' rights also a guy who gets really close to women at parties and won't respect their space?
-
It's not a simple hypothetical exercise. It can't be. Not because the students aren't being fair, but because *it can't be.*
- 5 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@sarahjeong when I was at HLS she had a reputation of focusing almost exclusively on BDSM for unclear pedagogical reasons. Still the case? -
@megerman not exclusively, and I'm having a hard time recalling a lesson specifically focused on BDSM. She picked some weird angles tho -
@sarahjeong I suspect/hope she's toned it down. Her fashion/IP article also heavy on leather and whips. It was odd at the time. -
@megerman i think she enjoys trolling people a little in the academic context, which i get, because that is tbh p funny -
@sarahjeong no doubt. I'll take that over Dersh any day.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@sarahjeong@NewYorker Thank you. Also upset to see continued framing of Rolling Stone story as an example of caring too much for survivors.Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.