@haley @sarahjeong @vogon which means there are places orientation is not protected but trans status is quantum-protected-legally-maybe
@vogon @haley @mcclure111 i think we'll see a change for sexual orientation in the courts in the next 10 yrs but not for trans rights
-
-
@sarahjeong@haley@mcclure111 that sounds about right, but do you think the courts would strike down gender identity non-discrimination -- -
@sarahjeong@haley@mcclure111 -- or just refuse to commit to a level of judicial scrutiny and leave individual laws in a gray area -
@vogon@haley@mcclure111 the cases supporting gender identity protection in title vii come from cases about cis women actually -
@vogon@haley@mcclure111 those cases aren't going anywhere -
@sarahjeong@haley@mcclure111 if new legislation appeared explicitly protecting trans folks, how do you think it would fare in the courts -
@vogon@sarahjeong@haley And as far as that goes, courts would treat such legislation fine EXCEPT religious exemptions would be a concern… -
@vogon@sarahjeong@haley …but only because the roberts court is unpredictable and seems prone to creating special rights for RW christians -
@mcclure111@vogon@sarahjeong thanks for clarifying this
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.