Wish RS and WaPo would specify what the other "discrepancies" are.
-
The "discrepancies" they're leaning on aren't coming from the alleged rapist, and they don't have to do with how horrible the story is
They're mundane who/what/when/where details, none of the things that actually kicked up this guy's supposed "bullshit detector"
-
-
None of this has to do with not interviewing the alleged attackers. None of this has to do with the line "Grab its leg."
-
The people who called bullshit on this story called bullshit because they couldn't believe nice white college boys were monsters.
-
It's not rape because she didn't struggle. It's not rape because she didn't report. It's not rape because he sounds psychotic.
-
It's not rape because she couldn't recall all the details. And no doubt, in the future, it won't be rape because she remembers too much.
-
This story was criticized for playing into established "beliefs" about the fraternity system.
-
But all of the skeptical responses have channeled established rape culture responses.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.