Wish RS and WaPo would specify what the other "discrepancies" are.
-
1) If you're going to doubt a victim, you need more than just that and "there were other discrepancies."
2) If this was going to be a problem for a published piece, how did it not come up in fact check?
-
-
3) Note that contacting the alleged rapists has nothing to do with this! Fuck "Slate is vindicated."
-
They could have contacted *other women who say they've been raped* and they'd get similar concerns-- like WaPo did.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@sarahjeong isn't this 1000% the fault of fact-checkers and/or editors, not of victim? -
.
@DeepOmega Right, and the victim asking her friend later about which frat house is which is not reporting and shouldn't be treated as such. -
@sarahjeong absolutely. and the RS piece didn't even mention this - it presented hazy post-attack reconstruction as settled fact
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@sarahjeong My guess is that it did. They went with it anyway and got burnedMerci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
@sarahjeong What is thing you call, “fact check?"Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.