Wish RS and WaPo would specify what the other "discrepancies" are.
-
I go out places, and I'll be fuzzy on who/what/when/where even in the moment.
1) If you're going to doubt a victim, you need more than just that and "there were other discrepancies."
-
-
2) If this was going to be a problem for a published piece, how did it not come up in fact check?
-
3) Note that contacting the alleged rapists has nothing to do with this! Fuck "Slate is vindicated."
-
They could have contacted *other women who say they've been raped* and they'd get similar concerns-- like WaPo did.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@sarahjeong raped me. I'm kinda fuzzy on details bu that's cos it was 'in the moment'. "don't doubt the victim" as@sarahjeong says.@nytimes why are you employing a rapist?Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
@sarahjeong@tchopstl This is the norm that#McCulloch put into place. -
@tulipblood This is not about Michael Brown--this is about WaPo's new "Jackie" reporting today. The UVA gang rape. -
@tchopstl It is the same thing. The media can make a person innocent/guilty just like the GJ can -
@tulipblood True enough. This story has become about the ambitions of the media, not about the apparent UVA rape victim.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.