Wish RS and WaPo would specify what the other "discrepancies" are.
The discrepancies listed by WaPo are details that a victim would have extrapolated (incorrectly?) in the aftermath.
-
-
I go out places, and I'll be fuzzy on who/what/when/where even in the moment.
-
1) If you're going to doubt a victim, you need more than just that and "there were other discrepancies."
-
2) If this was going to be a problem for a published piece, how did it not come up in fact check?
-
3) Note that contacting the alleged rapists has nothing to do with this! Fuck "Slate is vindicated."
-
They could have contacted *other women who say they've been raped* and they'd get similar concerns-- like WaPo did.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Ahhhh, the racist is now eating crow. How you have a job with the failing NYT is beyond me. My guess is that they will drop you soon. The level of racism you exhibit can't be defended for very long. Good riddance.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.