"the most successful movements have been those that adhered to the principles of nonviolence" hmm
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
right, because the 14th Amendment didn't come from a literal war or anything
2 réponses 19 Retweets 31 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong let's talk about the first ten amendments too1 réponse 2 Retweets 3 j'aime -
En réponse à @eevee
@eevee In fairness, the Constitution was not really a product of war. Not the same as the 13th/14th.@sarahjeong1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @JoThoHalloran
@JoThoHalloran@sarahjeong the /country/ was a product of war, and the constitution defines (constitutes!) the country2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @eevee
@eevee@JoThoHalloran and amendments like the 2nd, 3rd, 4th specifically address British practices right before the Revolution2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong That's contested. A more realistic reading sees those as heirs of British law rather than American Revolution.@eevee1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @JoThoHalloran
@JoThoHalloran@eevee And you can read the 14th as a natural fit with the 5th. It doesn't erase the serious disruption prior to its writing.2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
@JoThoHalloran @eevee And see this, re: history of the 4th. https://privacysos.org/node/1088
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.