@sarahjeong One thing that's not clear is whether there's a legal difference between undirected speech, and speech 'at' someone.
I wrote about the Facebook threats case that's going up to the Supreme Court http://www.theverge.com/2014/11/26/7292755/supreme-court-tackle-online-threats-elonis …
-
-
-
@mathpunk it's a little muddy in this case because in pretty much all the posts he makes reference to the subjects reading them -
@mathpunk dude totally knows people are reading his posts and getting upset -
@sarahjeong@mathpunk even so, I'm skeptical that undirected speech is possible on Facebook at all -
@russellbrandom@mathpunk his cert petition makes a big deal of the fact that his wife isn't friends with him on Facebook ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ -
@sarahjeong@russellbrandom Oh, the "I'm not touching youuuu" defense -
@mathpunk@russellbrandom "I'm not touching youuuuu PS here's an ASCII map of your house and here's where I'd stand if I wanted to kill you" -
@sarahjeong@russellbrandom I don't think even Eminem has gone ASCII. wtg garbageur - 1 réponse de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@sarahjeong this article is great, thanks for writing it :) -
@vogon aw man dude thanks
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@sarahjeong Connecting the issue to context collapse is really good. Icymi, Quinn Norton on context: https://medium.com/message/context-collapse-architecture-and-plows-d23a0d2f7697 …Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
@sarahjeong you are so awesome!!!!Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.