What's the best rigorous legal analysis of the Federal Circuit's Oracle v. Google opinion, esp. its review of 9th Cir. precedent?
-
@xor@copiesofcopies@binarybits@tieguy I don't know of one that hits all the points but I recall that Pamela Samuelson wrote a quick post,
@xor @copiesofcopies @binarybits @tieguy and there was also a rebuttal of the Federal Cir's interpretation of Lotus v. Borland in the 1st
-
-
@sarahjeong@xor@binarybits@tieguy like, of whether it's actually binding, or of its holding? -
@copiesofcopies@xor@binarybits@tieguy the holding.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@xor@copiesofcopies@binarybits@tieguy the links in item 1 are a good compilation, nothing works as canonical tho http://tinyletter.com/5ua/letters/api-in-the-sky-5-useful-articles-vol-1-issue-8 … -
@sarahjeong@copiesofcopies@binarybits@tieguy re-reading this reminded me Jon Band's stuff for DisCo was pretty in-depth -
@xor@sarahjeong@binarybits@tieguy thanks, I'll check all of this out. I should probably also read the amici. -
@copiesofcopies@xor@sarahjeong@tieguy The EFF and PK briefs are both excellent.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.