@fatachrestic pretty much, pretty much
-
-
-
@fatachrestic or they are at a level where they just walk around assuming other people know more than they actually do
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@sarahjeong Take the Stanford crypto course. Then you will know more than 99% of condescending cryptosplainers. -
@evacide that course is the goddamn devil -
@sarahjeong I understand that upon completion, you get a special tattoo. And superpowers. -
@evacide the list of people who gave up on that course is long and illustrious -
@sarahjeong "They tried and failed?" "They tried and died!"#dune
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@sarahjeong Happy to talk sometime if it's useful/answer questions as best I can. Y'know, when you aren't being beset by douchemen. -
@Dymaxion yes pls
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@sarahjeong So what *do* you want explained, anyway? -
@puellavulnerata nothing other than zero knowledge proofs which I'm idly curious about. I'm just mad at UNSOLICITED CRYPTOSPLAINING on fb - 1 réponse de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@sarahjeong@OaklandElle so public key and private key… -
@thegrugq I will find you, and I will destroy you. Just fucking don't.@sarahjeong -
@OaklandElle@sarahjeong oh, too advanced? Well, we can start with something more basic…pic.twitter.com/zuFmKX3K2T
-
Tweet indisponible
-
@atyoung@thegrugq@sarahjeong what is this "Google" of which you speak? -
@OaklandElle@atyoung@sarahjeong it’s like DuckDuckGo, but for people that want to find what they’re looking for.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.