@sarahjeong Wow. Why wrongly decided? I like 230 as much as anyone, but this seems a legit exception, like Barnes. (Or was that wrong too?)
this is an awful and devastasting fact pattern for a very sympathetic plaintiff, and it's also wrongly decided :( http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2014/09/17/12-56638.pdf …
-
-
-
@brianwc really? failure-to-warn tort liability surviving 230 seems incorrect to me. I'd like to see@ericgoldman's write-up, of course -
@sarahjeong@brianwc@ericgoldman the analysis saying, "but this is really about the provider's content" is way way off. -
@CathyGellis@sarahjeong@ericgoldman In Barnes we learned you can't make promises, not keep them, and have 230 excuse it. Seems OK. (1/2) -
@CathyGellis@sarahjeong@ericgoldman Now we learn u can't know your site poses real risk of serious harm 2 your users & not warn them.(2/2)
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@sarahjeong read while waiting for takeout. Holy fuck that is terrifying!Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.