Question for #copyright peeps: Amazing skill, but (assuming photo reference material) copyrightable? http://youtu.be/YIaEaB3tbWc
-
-
En réponse à @ShadesofGrayLaw
@pchestek ... original interpretation of existing photo? (derivative work) or slavish copy of photo? (2/2)2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @ShadesofGrayLaw
@ShadesofGrayLaw@pchestek Once read a fascinating blog post by an artist (who primarily does sketches from photo reference) on this2 réponses 1 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@ShadesofGrayLaw@pchestek He said that he draws hyperrealistic drawings refocus the artwork on particular elements, remove other elements1 réponse 1 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@ShadesofGrayLaw@pchestek would run against the slavish copy analysis. let me see if I can find, this was years and years ago1 réponse 1 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong@pchestek that's not really counter to slavish copy analysis - it's factually difft. if artist removes elements and ...1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @ShadesofGrayLaw
@sarahjeong@pchestek refocuses others, that could be enough for some independently copyrightable matter. But would still be derivative2 réponses 0 Retweet 2 j'aime -
En réponse à @ShadesofGrayLaw
@ShadesofGrayLaw@pchestek can't find the original but here's something http://drawpj.com/armin-mersmann-golden-anniversary-interview-with-cindy-wider/ …pic.twitter.com/JNLBrgxZLM
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@ShadesofGrayLaw@pchestek (naturally this is different since he always takes his own photos and uses multiple references)1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
@ShadesofGrayLaw @pchestek but a very big question IMO since a lot of artists today use google images, etc. for references on details
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.