Question for #copyright peeps: Amazing skill, but (assuming photo reference material) copyrightable? http://youtu.be/YIaEaB3tbWc
-
@pchestek ... original interpretation of existing photo? (derivative work) or slavish copy of photo? (2/2)
@ShadesofGrayLaw @pchestek Once read a fascinating blog post by an artist (who primarily does sketches from photo reference) on this
-
-
@ShadesofGrayLaw@pchestek He said that he draws hyperrealistic drawings refocus the artwork on particular elements, remove other elements -
@ShadesofGrayLaw@pchestek would run against the slavish copy analysis. let me see if I can find, this was years and years ago -
@sarahjeong@pchestek that's not really counter to slavish copy analysis - it's factually difft. if artist removes elements and ... -
@sarahjeong@pchestek refocuses others, that could be enough for some independently copyrightable matter. But would still be derivative -
@ShadesofGrayLaw@pchestek can't find the original but here's something http://drawpj.com/armin-mersmann-golden-anniversary-interview-with-cindy-wider/ …pic.twitter.com/JNLBrgxZLM
-
@ShadesofGrayLaw@pchestek (naturally this is different since he always takes his own photos and uses multiple references) -
@ShadesofGrayLaw@pchestek but a very big question IMO since a lot of artists today use google images, etc. for references on details
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@sarahjeong@pchestek do you have the link?Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.