@mikedelic what do you mean not disclosing? Not getting that
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong why not disclose what many others see as a conflict of interest wrt business journalism. or did he disclose1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @mikedelic
@mikedelic he's disclosed consistently since early days of reporting in 20122 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
-
En réponse à @mikedelic
@mikedelic agree that advocating buying bitcoin makes it weird but i don't think disclosure is the issue1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong right i think it's a somewhat trivial earmark1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @mikedelic
@sarahjeong the conflict of interest seems obvious. though other people get away with similar stuff very often bc media is corrupt2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @mikedelic
@mikedelic i think it's impossible to cover a lot of stuff if too-strict rules are adopted, and disclosure does a lot of work here2 réponses 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong yah, and again, im not sure that he is "covering" in the reportorial sense. i might be splitting hairs1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @mikedelic
@mikedelic i think it's in a legit gray area and reasonable minds may disagree2 réponses 0 Retweet 1 j'aime
@mikedelic at least you are consistent across industries tho, some bitcoin exceptionalism in these twitter discussions
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.