maybe this is pot-kettle of me but this markdown thing really seems like nerds getting mad for no reason
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong A boring standards argument on the surface, I think it’s an interesting conflict between creator rights and open-source culture.1 réponse 1 Retweet 5 j'aime -
En réponse à @waxpancake
@waxpancake@sarahjeong It's almost a thing where, according to some people's standards, the "brand" is more like attribution.2 réponses 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @SherwinTKTK
@SherwinPK Ooh, an IP expert appears! Can a software license prevent someone from using the name in a project that doesn’t reuse its source?2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @waxpancake
@waxpancake Um, my thinking is that the name itself isn't copyrighted/copyrightable. Legal cause of action would be trademark, if any..2 réponses 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @SherwinTKTK
@SherwinPK@waxpancake potentially interesting comparison to Java & Oracle v. Google tho.2 réponses 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong@waxpancake aaaaah. Thing is, though, he's upset about the use of the name, right? not the modification of the standard itself2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @SherwinTKTK
@SherwinPK@sarahjeong Correct. He just wants them to call it something that's not Markdown, because it's not Markdown.2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @waxpancake
@waxpancake@sarahjeong Right which is why the normative Qs are cooler than the legal ones, IMO. It's like attribution rts for a thing.1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
@SherwinPK @waxpancake the normative ones are cooler but I think there are funny and strange legal ones afoot as well
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.