@sarahjeong YES, PRIORITIZING RIGHTS ALONG SUBJECTIVE LINES HAS CAUSED NO ISSUES TO DATE THAT I CAN THINK OF.
-
-
-
it's also just totally not true, constitutionally speaking
@Hanksingle -
@sarahjeong@Hanksingle Shouldn't be true, but we see in cases re: reporters privilege and such some efforts to make it true. -
@CathyGellis@Hanksingle I’m cool with add’l statutory safeguards for journalism but let’s not make shit up about the constitution -
@sarahjeong@Hanksingle My point is that these proposed laws presume it's the First Amendment makes the special class. -
@sarahjeong@Hanksingle They aren't trying to protect the activity, they are trying to protect the class, and they assume 1st A allows this.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@sarahjeong haha oh honey no - Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@sarahjeong Skipping pass wishing for an unfavorite button to press to a button that would make this guys phone self-destruct.Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
HAHAHAHAhaaaaaa oh boy RT
@sarahjeong lolhttps://twitter.com/mtracey/status/500716882316783617 …
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.