sarah jeong

@xor @doesitquack @flamsmark @maassive I still think the implied license would be a bullshit judicial construct but prob one that's needed

@sarahjeong @doesitquack @flamsmark @maassive implied license would mean subject couldn't stop Dave from exploiting work... Strange outcome

@xor @doesitquack @flamsmark @maassive I also think it's weird to decide an implied license on a case by case basis

@xor @doesitquack @flamsmark @maassive like there's a pretty strong cultural intuition that goes the other way, no exceptions

@sarahjeong @doesitquack @flamsmark @maassive the "correct" answer ought to be insufficient originality, no ©, but that breaks stuff

@xor @doesitquack @flamsmark @maassive tests involving creativity are not very administrable. Even less administrable than the Purge.

@sarahjeong @xor @doesitquack @maassive Are works produced during the Purge exempt from copyright and automatically in the public domain?

@flamsmark @sarahjeong @doesitquack @maassive that seems like it would cause some problems with our international obligations