@maassive under current doctrine yes, (with the caveat that Garcia v. Google is a little funny). But not been tested in court I think (?).
-
@xor@doesitquack@flamsmark@maassive I also think it's weird to decide an implied license on a case by case basis
@xor @doesitquack @flamsmark @maassive like there's a pretty strong cultural intuition that goes the other way, no exceptions
-
-
@sarahjeong@doesitquack@flamsmark@maassive the "correct" answer ought to be insufficient originality, no ©, but that breaks stuff -
@xor@doesitquack@flamsmark@maassive tests involving creativity are not very administrable. Even less administrable than the Purge. -
@sarahjeong@xor@doesitquack@maassive Are works produced during the Purge exempt from copyright and automatically in the public domain? -
@flamsmark@sarahjeong@doesitquack@maassive that seems like it would cause some problems with our international obligations -
@xor@flamsmark@doesitquack@maassive I feel like the Purge would raise many other international concerns of greater priority -
@sarahjeong@flamsmark@doesitquack@maassive sure it ought to, but you know how copyright exceptionalism works. -
@xor@flamsmark@doesitquack@maassive I also believe that civil liability is not suspended during the Purge but this is unconfirmable -
@sarahjeong@flamsmark@doesitquack@maassive lol I bet the MPAA got copyright exceptions worked into the Purge bylaws - 2 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.