Facebook did a psychological study of 689,000 users without their knowledge. Don't feel weird about it. http://wapo.st/1r7zHag
-
-
@sarahjeong The first part presumes Facebook was capriciously meddling with people's emotions while the second (1/2) -
@sarahjeong …suggests Facebook's intentions may have been sincere, if poorly communicated or executed. -
@b_fung I wouldn’t call the Stanford prison experiment “capricious” but that’s beside the point.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@sarahjeong@b_fung perhaps next time have actual academics check the hypothesis. When I think science, FB doesn't make the list.Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
@sarahjeong Basically a slightly obfuscated take on "It's legitimate because I say so."@b_fungMerci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
@sarahjeong@b_fung FB wasn't trying to make people sad. They were "testing a legitimate hypothesis" that they can make people sad. Ummmm...Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.