my fave Daily Show joke: “Make a sock puppet of Clarence Thomas. Put your arm in it. Ta-da! You’re Antonin Scalia.” http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/06/24/upshot/24up-scotus-agreement-rates.html …
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
(One of my Harvard friends argued that it was actually the other way around—Scalia follows Thomas—which I guess is possible).
2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
I’d love to see an infographic on how frequently one justice joins onto a particular justice’s opinion. That might say more.
3 réponses 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong How far back do machine-readable SCOTUS decisions go? This might be something@overviewproject could do.1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @znmeb
@znmeb@overviewproject I feel like they should all be available, publicly? Though I’m not sure where I’d look for a single repository.3 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong@overviewproject Surely@SCOTUSblog has them.1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @znmeb
@znmeb Nah, I’d probably look here http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/home … and here http://www.oyez.org/ first, but I don’t think either are complete1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
@znmeb Complete enough for an analysis of the current bench, though, I think!
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.