my fave Daily Show joke: “Make a sock puppet of Clarence Thomas. Put your arm in it. Ta-da! You’re Antonin Scalia.” http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/06/24/upshot/24up-scotus-agreement-rates.html …
-
(One of my Harvard friends argued that it was actually the other way around—Scalia follows Thomas—which I guess is possible).
I’d love to see an infographic on how frequently one justice joins onto a particular justice’s opinion. That might say more.
-
-
@sarahjeong How far back do machine-readable SCOTUS decisions go? This might be something@overviewproject could do. -
@znmeb@overviewproject I feel like they should all be available, publicly? Though I’m not sure where I’d look for a single repository. -
@sarahjeong@overviewproject Surely@SCOTUSblog has them. -
@znmeb Nah, I’d probably look here http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/home … and here http://www.oyez.org/ first, but I don’t think either are complete -
@znmeb Complete enough for an analysis of the current bench, though, I think!
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@sarahjeong There's this chart of how often they vote together. Not quite it, right? http://www.scotusblog.com/statistics/ pic.twitter.com/zlfG6JWDEv
-
@xor@peteyreplies did either of you guys even see that link in the original tweet smh -
@sarahjeong@peteyreplies no because "original" tweet is arbitrarily displayed by Twitter logic don't make this a Men thing sarah -
@xor@peteyreplies how like a Man to accuse me of making this a Man thing
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@sarahjeong Thomas probably dissents more, but just to say he still disagrees with most 20th century precedent.Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.