OK this is gated and I'm not on my computer so I can't use my Harvard access but OH MY GOD WHAT http://m.us.wsj.com/articles/patent-office-comanches-1403132099?mobile=y …
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
First of all, it's the uspTo. T for Trademark. Secondly, it's the law. Lanham Act 2(a). Thirdly, WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU???
1 réponse 2 Retweets 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong that was the stupidest thing I've read all week. (Smaller clipping is second).pic.twitter.com/gRoPr0g0Qn
1 réponse 0 Retweet 2 j'aime -
En réponse à @KendraSerra
@KendraSerra UGGGh. Also: I don't know why people keep parroting this "word-for-word identical" thing. I ran the doc compare. It's not.1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong It may go without saying, but that article is also racist as fuck. George Custer? Elizabeth Warren as a Cherokee elder?1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @KendraSerra
@KendraSerra i hope that's not the part that made you think "this is pretty racist"1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong Right, of course not. Aside from the inherent racism of the actual content (expected of WSJ), also racist snarky asides.1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime
@KendraSerra i'm just messing with you
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.