First of all, it's the uspTo. T for Trademark. Secondly, it's the law. Lanham Act 2(a). Thirdly, WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU???
-
-
-
@sarahjeong that was the stupidest thing I've read all week. (Smaller clipping is second).pic.twitter.com/gRoPr0g0Qn
-
@KendraSerra UGGGh. Also: I don't know why people keep parroting this "word-for-word identical" thing. I ran the doc compare. It's not. -
@sarahjeong It may go without saying, but that article is also racist as fuck. George Custer? Elizabeth Warren as a Cherokee elder? -
@KendraSerra i hope that's not the part that made you think "this is pretty racist" -
@sarahjeong Right, of course not. Aside from the inherent racism of the actual content (expected of WSJ), also racist snarky asides. -
@KendraSerra i'm just messing with you
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@adamsteinbaugh smh smh smh -
@sarahjeong To Be Grossly Offended, Please Log In Or Subscribe
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
@sarahjeong@Driveswift Speechless -
@KRGMOM "The 2-to-1 decision came in response to a lawsuit by Native American activists who want to devalue the Washington football brand"
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@sarahjeong Refusing to take action is interference now?Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
wut RT
@sarahjeong: OK this is gated and I'm not on my computer so I can't use my Harvard access but OH MY GOD WHAT http://m.us.wsj.com/articles/patent-office-comanches-1403132099?mobile=y …”Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
@sarahjeong wowwwwwMerci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.