What's the best argument for *not* abolishing the third party doctrine?
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong hm. I'd say: if it were properly interpreted (and significantly narrowed from now), the underlying concept is reasonably sound?1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong I agree. It was born improperly construed. But there's a kernal of a reasonable idea in there, I guess.1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong yes that's basically what I'm saying. So, ok, I can't actually come up with a good argument.1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.