What's the best argument for *not* abolishing the third party doctrine?
-
@sarahjeong hm. I'd say: if it were properly interpreted (and significantly narrowed from now), the underlying concept is reasonably sound?
-
-
@sarahjeong I agree. It was born improperly construed. But there's a kernal of a reasonable idea in there, I guess. -
@xor well you'd just have to apply reasonable expectation of privacy to categorize third parties differently -
@xor which is hard and you might as well not bring "third party" into it and that's my point -
@xor since REP is already the test. -
@sarahjeong yes. The only reasonable defense I can think of for any kind of 3PD is as, like, a non-dispositive factor of REP analysis
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.