Pro-tip: whenever you have a question about the 4th Amendment, just google your question + “Orin Kerr” http://www.btlj.org/data/articles/24_3/24_3_8.pdf …
-
-
-
Oop, original article also: http://www.michiganlawreview.org/assets/pdfs/107/4/kerr.pdf …
- 1 réponse de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@sarahjeong hm. I'd say: if it were properly interpreted (and significantly narrowed from now), the underlying concept is reasonably sound? -
@xor I don't even agree with how it arises in the original case -
@sarahjeong I agree. It was born improperly construed. But there's a kernal of a reasonable idea in there, I guess. -
@xor well you'd just have to apply reasonable expectation of privacy to categorize third parties differently -
@xor which is hard and you might as well not bring "third party" into it and that's my point -
@xor since REP is already the test. -
@sarahjeong yes. The only reasonable defense I can think of for any kind of 3PD is as, like, a non-dispositive factor of REP analysis
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@sarahjeong ask Orin -
@laurenmpayne I can't work up the courage -
@sarahjeong hey girl I gotchu.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@sarahjeong .... crickets ...Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
@sarahjeong third party doctrine proponents believe it creates an easily understood, easy to apply rule. (Though I disagree abt that) - 1 réponse de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.