2) Fair use is codified for copyright, but not for trademark. Fair use in trademark is very limited and it's not clear it applies here.
-
-
-
3) It's not actually clear whether trademark infringement has actually occurred. Reasonable and informed minds may disagree.
-
4) No, but seriously, trademark isn't copyright.
-
@sarahjeong seems like clear nominative fair use to me -
@danielnazer Absolutely for the use of the name IKEA, but I also think there's colorable arguments for dilution and trade dress infringement -
@sarahjeong@danielnazer Not colorable arguments. Whiny, self-entitled arguments that are divorced from any concept of consumer protection.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@sarahjeong@levendowski if we could just make that generally known, it would free up at least a quarter of my teaching time…Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
@sarahjeong Reviewing now. Thanks for flagging and for the additional commentary/insight.Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.