.@rustyk5 What @meganerickson did was vile, and we know it. But if her personal privacy is violated, much like mine, it should come down.
-
.
@skilpat This was never about the public/private distinction. That distinction has *always* been irrelevant to the discussion.
.@skilpat Publicizing certain kinds of information signifies a kind of intent and a relationship between the writer and the subject.
-
-
.
@skilpat In the case of Jacobin &@sarahkendzior, drawing attention to the tweet made no sense, except to criticize her. -
.
@skilpat Rusty’s coverage of Megan was already known to be negative. Megan’s communication to Rusty was already hostile. No surprises. -
.
@skilpat But what gets me is that threatening to sue someone while claiming secrecy in your threat is NOT okay. -
.
@skilpat This is a line that we should not cross. -
Tweet indisponible
-
You don’t have to be a lawyer to realize it’s fucking shady to censor a legal threat.
@skilpat -
It’s already shady to censor journalism with a libel threat. To censor republication of your own threat takes the fucking cake.
@skilpat
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.