Sarah Kendzior
.@rustyk5 What @meganerickson did was vile, and we know it. But if her personal privacy is violated, much like mine, it should come down.
-
@sarahjeong But public tweet (w/ immediate unequivocal apology & removal) is claimed as so obviously private? Are you serious?
sarah jeong
Scott Kilpatrick
.@skilpat This was never about the public/private distinction. That distinction has *always* been irrelevant to the discussion.
-
-
.
@skilpat Publicizing certain kinds of information signifies a kind of intent and a relationship between the writer and the subject. -
.
@skilpat In the case of Jacobin &@sarahkendzior, drawing attention to the tweet made no sense, except to criticize her. - View other replies
-
.
@skilpat Rusty’s coverage of Megan was already known to be negative. Megan’s communication to Rusty was already hostile. No surprises. -
.
@skilpat But what gets me is that threatening to sue someone while claiming secrecy in your threat is NOT okay. - View other replies
-
.
@skilpat This is a line that we should not cross. -
@sarahjeong Well it's a shame Megan's not a lawyer like you or she mighta known. Or the kind of woman ur brand of feminism wants to protect. - View other replies
-
You don’t have to be a lawyer to realize it’s fucking shady to censor a legal threat.
@skilpat -
It’s already shady to censor journalism with a libel threat. To censor republication of your own threat takes the fucking cake.
@skilpat - Show more
-
-
.
@sarahjeong I thought everyone agreed that due to sensitive nature, writer should *fucking ask*. Megan clearly didn't know it'd be pub'd. -
@sarahjeong I'm impressed by the clarity you've brought to this whole saga!@skilpat
John Nor
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.