.@rustyk5 What @meganerickson did was vile, and we know it. But if her personal privacy is violated, much like mine, it should come down.
@sarahkendzior @rustyk5 @meganerickson I do not think anyone should claim confidentiality in a communication conveying legal threats.
-
-
@sarahjeong@rustyk5@meganerickson Yes, and her essay is of course full of lies as usual. But I wouldn't wish this on anyone, even her. -
Tweet indisponible
-
@rustyk5 I appreciate all your reporting on this and I agree seems meant to be public. But I hope it does not lead to attack
@meganerickson
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
.
@skilpat This was never about the public/private distinction. That distinction has *always* been irrelevant to the discussion. -
.
@skilpat Publicizing certain kinds of information signifies a kind of intent and a relationship between the writer and the subject. -
.
@skilpat In the case of Jacobin &@sarahkendzior, drawing attention to the tweet made no sense, except to criticize her. -
.
@skilpat Rusty’s coverage of Megan was already known to be negative. Megan’s communication to Rusty was already hostile. No surprises. -
.
@skilpat But what gets me is that threatening to sue someone while claiming secrecy in your threat is NOT okay. -
.
@skilpat This is a line that we should not cross. - 3 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@sarahjeong@sarahkendzior @rustyk5@meganerickson You've got the lawyer-speak down, I'll give you that.Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.