In the future, when you win a torts case you'll be able to enjoin the defendant to go back in time and prevent their negligence
"The common law remedy of time travel is well-settled and does not violate the Constitution" - the Supreme Court in the year 3000
-
-
@sarahjeong by the year 3000 I figure they'll just be starting to wrap their heads around bitcoin -
@BroSeLitigant by the year 3000 we'll have replaced the supreme court with robots so I think they'll have a sense of what an API is -
@BroSeLitigant unfortunate side-effect: now every justice is obsessed with dictionaries
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@sarahjeong (a) This presumes time travel works both ways, and (b) then why don't we have it yet? -
@CathyGellis lol I was making a SCOTUS-makes-things-up joke but the idea of time traveling and changing Blackstone is 10x funnier omg -
@sarahjeong Time travel pretty much destroys the notion of stare decisis.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.