It’s so fucking weird that Oracle v. Google ended up in the Federal Circuit, when only the copyright claims were considered.
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
Guess what’s even weirder? Its precedential effect: http://www.project-disco.org/intellectual-property/051214-further-reflections-on-oracle-v-google/ … (SPOILER: none)
1 réponse 1 Retweet 2 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
seriously tho: Oracle v. Google is appealed to the Federal Circuit on the basis of a patent claim that doesn’t even get litigated
1 réponse 1 Retweet 3 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
In order to determine the copyright claims, the Federal Circuit applies Ninth Circuit law. It (arguably) fucks it up.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 2 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
In fact, it fucks it up so hard, that by claiming that “Google did not seek to foster compatibility,” it turns its own analysis into dicta
1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
And then on top of that, because it’s the Federal Circuit, it’s not even binding precedent in the Ninth Circuit. Or anywhere, actually.
2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong Future plaintiffs can opt in to FC jurisdiction by throwing in a patent claim right?3 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @binarybits
@binarybits theoretically, yes. but it’s not like patents come out of thin air, even with this USPTO. +1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
@binarybits I’m still puzzled by how venue play it in a similar appeal, w/ no patent claim litigated—how a D would stop from going to FC.
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.