Should have tweeted this out earlier but I guess I was on my way to sleep on the sidewalk? @Lawgeek explains Aereo: http://www.salon.com/2014/04/21/scotus_v_the_internet_how_the_supreme_court_could_change_tv_and_streaming_video_forever/ …
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong@Lawgeek I'm curious why nobody's talking about Redd Horne. Might draw something later1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @BroSeLitigant
@BroSeLitigant@Lawgeek Good question. I’m pretty sure it was in the briefs (???) but it was absent from oral args!1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong@BroSeLitigant definitely in the briefs but less persuasive than Cablevision IMO and less on point.2 réponses 0 Retweet 2 j'aime -
En réponse à @Lawgeek
@Lawgeek@sarahjeong Certainly, but it does go directly to the "individuals as members of the public" theory with the car rental analogy1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @BroSeLitigant
@BroSeLitigant@sarahjeong yes, I think the car rental analogy fell pretty flat. But who knows what the Justices will find easier.1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
@Lawgeek @BroSeLitigant yeah, the car analogy was interestingly bad. I was fascinated by how poorly that landed.
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.