@OaklandPrivacy Nuclear Free Zone Ordinance still an issue, yes?
-
-
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong port is not subject to NFZO but city is. So...2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @OaklandPrivacy
@OaklandPrivacy@sarahjeong Still, all that HP equipment in the EOC, and the lying on the part of staff about SAIC's compliance, etc.1 réponse 2 Retweets 3 j'aime -
En réponse à @OKcouncil
@OKcouncil@OaklandPrivacy Also IMO something fishy is going on re: the amended motion that Kalb wrote back in July1 réponse 2 Retweets 1 j'aime -
-
En réponse à @OaklandPrivacy
@OaklandPrivacy@OKcouncil Keep saying how some cameras are live. But they’re not supposed to be recording until privacy policy in place.2 réponses 3 Retweets 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @sarahjeong
@sarahjeong@OaklandPrivacy I need to take another look at it.1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @OKcouncil
@OKcouncil@OaklandPrivacy I could be totally chasing something useless but it is definitely bothering me1 réponse 1 Retweet 1 j'aime -
-
En réponse à @OaklandPrivacy
@OaklandPrivacy@sarahjeong@OKcouncil Yes! @ times staff has claimed cameras operational but Kalb amdt says can't b online until pp inplace1 réponse 1 Retweet 1 j'aime
@jpmassar @OaklandPrivacy @OKcouncil I think exact wording might be like “recording” (?) — possibly still in compliance (?) , but it bugs me
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.