Venture capitalist personally invests $750K to split California six ways http://bit.ly/1hCJuPu pic.twitter.com/CxFffz9o89
-
@sarahjeong@samknight1 what about 0 californias
@adamsteinbaugh @samknight1 adam I had to actually look up Article IV and have a good think because of your stupid joke
-
-
@adamsteinbaugh@samknight1 the answer is: it’s ambiguously unconstitutional -
@sarahjeong@samknight1 I think this is one of those "this constitutional issue was answered by the Civil War: no." kinda things. -
@adamsteinbaugh@samknight1 well like if NV & CA merged to become Nevalifornia that would be zero Californias and there’s a way to do it -
@sarahjeong@samknight1 I think that would be a new state within the jurisdiction of existing state, but acceptable due to intent of Sec. 3 -
@adamsteinbaugh@samknight1 I mean it’s OK if you get the consent of the state legislatures + Congress— a ballot measure doesn’t do that tho -
@adamsteinbaugh@samknight1 which is what I mean by Tim Draper being a fucking moron -
@adamsteinbaugh@samknight1 plus there’s that amazing clause about future litigation over the ballot measure, let me see if i can find it - 4 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
@sarahjeong@samknight1 also now I'm looking up Article IV so I don't feel inadequateMerci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.